HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Toyota Aygo 2 vs Toyota Yaris 3 vs Audi A1

Variants
Pre-facelift Automatic
Pre-facelift Manual
1.0
1.33
1.33 Euro6
1.33 Euro6 CVT
1.33 CVT
1.4 D-4D Euro6
1.4 D-4D
1.4
Hybrid Euro6
1.5
1.5 CVT
Hybrid
GRMN
1.2 TFSI
1.4 TFSI 122
1.4 TFSI 122 DCT
1.4 TFSI 140
1.4 TFSI 140 DCT
1.4 TFSI 185 DCT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DCT
2.0 TDI

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
168 L / 5.9 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
3.6 L / 3.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
2.8 L / 3.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
4
5
5
Payload
375 kg / 827 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-/5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1460 mm / 57.5 in
1510 mm / 59.4 in
1416 mm / 55.7 in
Size | Length
3954 mm / 155.7 in
Size | Width
1615 mm / 63.6 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1740 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1430.0 mm / 56.3 in
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1420.0 mm / 55.9 in
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Weight
860.0 kg / 1896.0 lbs
Wheel Size
14 in, 15 in
Wheelbase
2340 mm / 92.1 in
2510 mm / 98.8 in
2469 mm / 97.2 in

Performance

Top Speed
160.0 km/h / 99.4 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
71.0 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Displacement
1.0 L / 60.9 cu-in / 998.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
18%
21%
22%
Pros
  • Cute exterior design
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Better looking than the Sportback
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very little cargo space
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.