HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Fiat 500 vs Fiat 500 facelift vs Ford Focus 4 facelift

Variants
0.9 TWIN AIR
1.2
1.3 Multijet
1.4
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 155
1.0 EcoBoost 155 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 95
ST 2.3 EcoBoost 280
ST 2.3 EcoBoost 280 AT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
4
4
5
Payload
440 kg / 970 lbs

Chassis

Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1488 mm / 58.6 in
Size | Length
3546 mm / 139.6 in
Size | Width
1627 mm / 64.1 in
1825 mm / 71.9 in | 1979 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1848 mm / 72.8 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1408.0 mm / 55.4 in
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheelbase
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.362

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2022

Reviews

Neofiliac score
20%
25%
34%
Pros
  • Excellent exterior styling
  • Small turning circle
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Good handling
  • Decent build quality
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • High 0.36 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Generic styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.