Compare Hyundai i30 vs Hyundai i30 III Hatchback facelift vs Chrysler PT Cruiser

Hyundai i30 III (PD) facelift Hatchback (2020)

Chrysler PT Cruiser Hatchback (2000-2010)

Hyundai Motor | Cars

Chrysler | Cars

Variants

1.4

1.4 Euro5

1.6 122

1.6 122 AT

1.6 126

1.6 126 Euro5

1.6 126 AT

1.6 126 Euro5 AT

1.6 CRDi 116

1.6 CRDi 116 Euro5

1.6 CRDi 116 Euro5 AT

1.6 CRDi 116 AT

1.6 CRDi 90 Euro5

1.6 CRDi 90

2.0 143

2.0 143 AT

2.0 CRDi

1.0 T-GDi

1.0 T-GDi DCT

1.5 DPi

1.5 T-GDi

1.5 T-GDi DCT

1.6 CRDi 115

1.6 CRDi 115 DCT

1.6 CRDi 136

1.6 CRDi 136 DCT

i30 N Performance

i30 N Performance DCT

1.6

2.0 141PS

2.0 141PS AT

2.0 150PS

2.0 150PS AT

2.2D 150PS

2.2D 121PS

2.4

2.4 AT

2.4T 182PS

2.4T 182PS AT

2.4T 220PS

2.4T 220PS AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity

6.2 L / 6.6 qt

Engine Oil Capacity

4.7 L / 5.0 qt

Fuel Capacity

53.0 L / 14.0 gal

50.0 L / 13.2 gal

57.0 L / 15.1 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Disc, 345 mm

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Disc, 314 mm

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Semi-independent

Tire Size

235/35 R19 Y

Turning Circle

10.2 m / 33.5 ft

11.7 m / 38.2 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Hatchback

5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height

1480 mm / 58.3 in

Size | Length

4340 mm / 170.9 in

Size | Width

1775 mm / 69.9 in

1795 mm / 70.7 in

Track Width | Front

1546.0 mm / 60.9 in

Track Width | Rear

1544.0 mm / 60.8 in

Wheel Size

15 in

8.0J x 19

Wheelbase

2650 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0

34.6 m / 113.5 ft

Coefficient Of Drag

0.33

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Bore

86.0 mm / 3.4 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

9.5:1

Engine | Stroke

86.0 mm / 3.4 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score

34%

32%

Pros

Small turning circle
Elegant exterior design
Fully independent suspension setup

Decent build quality
Decent performance
Good handling

So ugly that it's an icon

Cons

Horrible 0-100kph time

Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Can't even reach 200km/h
No powerful engine options
Not independent rear suspensions
Truly epitomizes ugliness

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.