Compare Hyundai ix20 vs Renault Grand Espace 4 vs Renault Modus

Variants
1.4 CRDi
1.4
1.6 CRDi
1.6 AT
1.9 dCi
2.0 dCi 130
2.0 dCi 131
2.0 dCi 150
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 AT
2.0 dCi 150 AT
2.0 dCi 173
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5
2.0 dCi 173 AT
2.0 dCi 173 AT
2.0 TCe 170
2.0 TCe 170 Euro5
2.0 TCe 170 AT
2.0 Turbo 163
2.0 Turbo 163 AT
2.0 Turbo 170
2.0 Turbo 170 AT
2.2 dCi 139 AT
2.2 dCi 150
2.2 dCi 150 AT
3.0 dCi 177 AT
3.0 dCi 181 AT
3.5 AT
3.5 Euro3 AT
1.2 TCe
1.2
1.4
1.5 dCi 103
1.5 dCi 106
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86
1.6 112
1.6 112 AT
1.6 88

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
440 L / 15.5 cu-ft ~ 1486 L / 52.5 cu-ft
456 L / 16.1 cu-ft ~ 3050 L / 107.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
83.0 L / 21.9 gal
49.0 L / 12.9 gal
Passengers
5
7
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Minivan
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1600 mm / 63.0 in
1589 mm / 62.6 in
Size | Length
4100 mm / 161.4 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1574.0 mm / 62.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1551.0 mm / 61.1 in
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
Wheelbase
2615 mm / 103.0 in
2482 mm / 97.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4

Production

Availability
2010 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
12%
31%
6%
Pros
  • Reasonably reliable engines
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Lots of space inside
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Rather bad design
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.