Compare Volkswagen Polo 5 (6R) vs Volkswagen Scirocco 3 vs Volkswagen Golf 8

Variants
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 TDI
1.2 TSI
1.2 TSI DCT
1.4
1.4 DCT
1.6 TDI 75
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DCT
GTI
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 160
1.4 TSI 160 DSG
2.0 TDI 140
2.0 TDI 140 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 170
2.0 TDI 170 DSG
2.0 TDI 177
2.0 TDI 177 DSG
2.0 TDI 184
2.0 TDI 184 DSG
2.0 TSI 180
2.0 TSI 180 DSG
2.0 TSI 200
2.0 TSI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 210
2.0 TSI 210 DSG
2.0 TSI GTS
2.0 TSI GTS DSG
Scirocco R 265
Scirocco R 265 DSG
Scirocco R 280
Scirocco R 280 DSG
1.0 eTSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 90
1.4 TSI 204 eHybrid DSG
1.5 eTSI 130 DSG
1.5 eTSI 150 DSG
1.5 TGI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
2.0 TDI 115
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
GTD DSG
GTE DSG
GTI
GTI Clubsport DSG
GTI DSG
R 4MOTION DSG

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
4
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.6 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
11.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
16.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
3- / 5-door Hatchback
3-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
133 mm / 5.2 in
Wheelbase
2578 mm / 101.5 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
139 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.275
Towing Capacity
630 kg / 1389 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
23%
51%
70%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Simple, modern design
  • New 7-speed DSG transmission
  • Good styling for a hatchback
  • Reasonably good handling
  • Lots of power in the Scirocco R
  • Rather good styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good handlding characteristics
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Some reliability concerns
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.