Compare Volkswagen Up vs SEAT Leon 4 vs Peugeot 308 III

Volkswagen Up / Skoda Citigo / SEAT Mii Hatchback (2011-2016)

Volkswagen | Cars

SEAT | Cars

Peugeot | Cars

Variants

1.0 60

1.0 60 AT

1.0 75

1.0 75 AT

1.0 CNG

1.0 eTSI DSG

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 90

1.4 e-HYBRID DSG

1.5 eTSI DSG

1.5 TGI

1.5 TGI DSG

1.5 TSI 130

1.5 TSI 150

2.0 TDI 115

2.0 TDI 150 DSG

2.0 TSI DSG

1.2 PureTech 110

1.2 PureTech 130

1.2 PureTech 130 AT

1.5 BlueHDi 130

1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT

1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180 AT

1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

251 L / 8.9 cu-ft ~ 951 L / 33.6 cu-ft

Engine Oil Capacity

3.4 L / 3.6 qt

Fuel Capacity

35.0 L / 9.2 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Torsion

Turning Circle

9.8 m / 32.1 ft

10.5 m / 34.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

12.8 kWh (gross)

12.4 kWh (gross)

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Body Style

3-5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

140 mm / 5.5 in

Size | Height

1489 mm / 58.6 in

Size | Length

3540 mm / 139.4 in

4368 mm / 172.0 in

4367 mm / 171.9 in

Size | Width

1645 mm / 64.8 in

1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1859 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)

Track Width | Front

1428.0 mm / 56.2 in

1559.0 mm / 61.4 in

Track Width | Rear

1424.0 mm / 56.1 in

1516.0 mm / 59.7 in

Wheelbase

2420 mm / 95.3 in

2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.28

Electric Range

58.0 km / 36.0 mi

Towing Capacity

750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 5

Engine

EB2DTS

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.5:1

Engine | Displacement

1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc

Engine | Type

Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-3 engine with 4 values per cylinder

Transmission | Gears

5-speed

Production

Availability

2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score

11%

17%

26%

Pros

Fuel efficient
Easy to drive and park
Small turning circle

Low official fuel consumption
Less ugly than before

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Improved styling

Cons

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
No independent rear suspensions

Poorly built
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.