Compare Volkswagen Up vs SEAT Ibiza 5 vs Hyundai Accent 5 Hatchback
Variants
1.0 60
1.0 60 AT
1.0 75
1.0 75 AT
1.0 CNG
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 65
1.0 75
1.0 80
1.0 80 Euro6d
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 90
1.6 TDI 80
1.6 TDI 95
1.6 TDI 95 Euro6d
1.6 TDI 95 DSG
1.6 GDI
1.6 GDI AT
1.6 DPi
1.6 DPi CVT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
251 L / 8.9 cu-ft ~ 951 L / 33.6 cu-ft
616 L / 21.8 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
3.4 L / 3.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
4
5
5
Payload
421 kg / 928 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
8.4 m / 27.6 ft
Construction
Body Style
3-5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1489 mm / 58.6 in
1444 mm / 56.9 in
1450 mm / 57.1 in
Size | Length
3540 mm / 139.4 in
4059 mm / 159.8 in
4185 mm / 164.8 in
Size | Width
1645 mm / 64.8 in
1780 mm / 70.1 in | 1942 mm / 76.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1729 mm / 68.1 in
Track Width | Front
1428.0 mm / 56.2 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1424.0 mm / 56.1 in
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
Weight
1159.0 kg / 2555.2 lbs
Wheelbase
2420 mm / 95.3 in
2564 mm / 100.9 in
2580 mm / 101.6 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
75.6 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.2:1
Engine | Displacement
1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-3 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
11%
17%
15%
Pros
- Fuel efficient
- Easy to drive and park
- Small turning circle
- Low official fuel consumption
- More coherent design than Mk4
- Very small turning circle
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small, unreliable engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Miserably low engine output
- Bland in styling
- Low build quality
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.