Compare Volkswagen Up vs SEAT Ibiza 4 vs Mini Hatch R56

Volkswagen Up / Skoda Citigo / SEAT Mii Hatchback (2011-2016)

Volkswagen | Cars

SEAT | Cars

MINI | Cars

Variants

1.0 60

1.0 60 AT

1.0 75

1.0 75 AT

1.0 CNG

1.0

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 110 DSG

1.0 TSI 95

1.2 60

1.2 70

1.2 TDI

1.2 TSI 105

1.2 TSI 105 DSG

1.2 TSI 85

1.2 TSI 90

1.4 85

1.4 85 2012+

1.4 TDI 105

1.4 TDI 75

1.4 TDI 80

1.4 TDI 90

1.4 TDI 90 DSG

1.4 TSI 140

1.4 TSI 150

1.4 TSI 150 DSG

1.6

1.6 DSG

1.6 LPG

1.6 TDI 105

1.6 TDI 90

1.6 TDI 90 DSG

1.9 TDI 105

1.9 TDI 90

2.0 TDI

Cooper 122PS

Cooper 122PS AT

Cooper 120PS

Cooper D 110PS

Cooper D 110PS AT

Cooper D 112PS

Cooper D 112PS AT

Cooper S 184PS

Cooper S 184PS AT

Cooper S 175PS

Cooper SD

Cooper SD AT

JCW

One 75PS

One MINIMALIST 75PS

One 98PS

One 98PS AT

One MINIMALIST 98PS

One D

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

251 L / 8.9 cu-ft ~ 951 L / 33.6 cu-ft

160 L / 5.7 cu-ft ~ 680 L / 24.0 cu-ft

Engine Oil Capacity

3.4 L / 3.6 qt

Fuel Capacity

35.0 L / 9.2 gal

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

Passengers

Payload

450 kg / 992 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Multi-link

Turning Circle

9.8 m / 32.1 ft

10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Body Style

3-5-door Hatchback

3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height

1489 mm / 58.6 in

1407 mm / 55.4 in

Size | Length

3540 mm / 139.4 in

Size | Width

1645 mm / 64.8 in

1693 mm / 66.7 in

1683 mm / 66.3 in

Track Width | Front

1428.0 mm / 56.2 in

Track Width | Rear

1424.0 mm / 56.1 in

Wheelbase

2420 mm / 95.3 in

2469 mm / 97.2 in

2467 mm / 97.1 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 5

Engine | Displacement

1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc

Engine | Type

Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-3 engine with 4 values per cylinder

Transmission | Gears

5-speed

6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score

11%

16%

26%

Pros

Fuel efficient
Easy to drive and park
Small turning circle

Low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Iconic design
Low official fuel consumption

Cons

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Unreliable small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.