Compare Volkswagen NEW Beetle 9C facelift vs Skoda Fabia 2 vs Volkswagen Up facelift

Volkswagen New Beetle (9C) facelift Hatchback (2005-2010)

Skoda Fabia 2 (5J) Hatchback (2007-2014)

Volkswagen Up / Skoda Citigo / SEAT Mii facelift Hatchback (2016)

Volkswagen | Cars

Skoda | Cars

Volkswagen | Cars

Variants

1.4

1.6

1.8 Turbo

1.9 TDI

2.0

2.0 AT

1.2 60 Euro5

1.2 70 Euro5

1.2 60

1.2 70

1.2 TDI 75

1.2 TSI 105

1.2 TSI 105 DSG

1.2 TSI 86

1.4 86 Euro5

1.4 86

1.4 TDI 70

1.4 TDI 80

1.6 105

1.6 105 AT

1.6 TDI 105

1.6 TDI 75

1.6 TDI 90

1.9 TDI 105

1.0 60

1.0 60 ASG

1.0 75

1.0 75 ASG

1.0 75 Euro6d

1.0 EcoFuel 68

1.0 EcoFuel 68 Euro6d

1.0 MPI 65

1.0 TSI 90

1.0 TSI 90 Euro6d

GTI

GTI Euro6d

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

209 L / 7.4 cu-ft ~ 769 L / 27.2 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

55.0 L / 14.5 gal

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, coil spring

Semi-independent, Torsion

Semi-independent

Turning Circle

10.0 m / 32.8 ft

9.8 m / 32.1 ft

Construction

Body Style

3-door Hatchback

5-door Hatchback

3-5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

130 mm / 5.1 in

135 mm / 5.3 in

144 mm / 5.7 in

Size | Height

1498 mm / 59.0 in

Size | Length

4129 mm / 162.6 in

3600 mm / 141.7 in

Size | Width

1721 mm / 67.8 in

1642 mm / 64.6 in

Track Width | Front

1507.0 mm / 59.3 in

1412.0 mm / 55.6 in

Track Width | Rear

1487.0 mm / 58.5 in

1408.0 mm / 55.4 in

Wheelbase

2515 mm / 99.0 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.38

0.33

Towing Capacity

600 kg / 1323 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1000 kg / 2205 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 4

Engine | Displacement

1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc

Reviews

Neofiliac score

22%

11%

Pros

So ugly it's loved by many

Very low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Low fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Cons

Bad 0-100kph time
High 0.38 drag coefficient
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions

Horrible performance
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.