Compare Ford Fiesta 7 vs Mazda 3 II Hatchback vs Mazda 2 III

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) Hatchback (2009-2013)

Mazda 2 / Demio III (DJ) Hatchback (2014-2019)

Ford | Cars

Mazda | Cars

Variants

1.0 EcoBoost 100

1.0 EcoBoost 100 AT

1.0 EcoBoost 125

1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT

1.0 EcoBoost 125 MHEV

1.0 EcoBoost 140

1.0 EcoBoost 155 MHEV

1.0 EcoBoost 95

1.1 70

1.1 85

1.1 Ti-VCT 75

1.5D 120

1.5D 85

ST 1.5 EcoBoost

1.6 CD 109

1.6 CD 115

1.6 105

1.6 105 AT

2.0 CD 150

2.0 DISI 150

2.0 150 AT

2.2 CD 185

2.5 167

2.5 167 AT

MPS / Mazdaspeed3

1.5 SkyActiv-D

1.5 SkyActiv-G 115

1.5 SkyActiv-G 75

1.5 SkyActiv-G 90

1.5 SkyActiv-G 90 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

280 L / 9.9 cu-ft ~ 950 L / 33.5 cu-ft

Coolant Capacity

7.5 L / 7.9 qt

Engine Oil Capacity

5.0 L / 5.3 qt

Fuel Capacity

42.0 L / 11.1 gal

44.0 L / 11.6 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Drum

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, coil spring, Elastic beam

Multi-link

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Construction

Body Style

3- / 5-door Hatchback

5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

133 mm / 5.2 in

143 mm / 5.6 in

Size | Height

1495 mm / 58.9 in

Size | Length

4060 mm / 159.8 in

Size | Width

1695 mm / 66.7 in | 1983 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)

Track Width | Front

1495.0 mm / 58.9 in

Track Width | Rear

1485.0 mm / 58.5 in

Wheelbase

2493 mm / 98.1 in

2640 mm / 103.9 in

2570 mm / 101.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.29

Towing Capacity

515 kg / 1135 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1100 kg / 2425 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 6

Engine

L5-VE

Engine | Redline

6200 rpm

Reviews

Neofiliac score

19%

47%

26%

Pros

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Rather beautifully styled
Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Small turning circle
Strong engine lineup

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Very low fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Cons

No powerful engine options
Only available with tiny engines
No independent rear suspensions

Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Bad 0-100kph time
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
Semi-independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.