Compare Ford Mondeo 2 Liftback vs Ford Taurus 6 facelift vs Ford Taurus 6

Variants
1.8 110
1.8 125
1.8 130
2.0 145
2.0 145 AT
2.0D 115
2.0D 115 AT
2.0D 90
2.0D 130
2.0D 130 AT
2.2D 155
2.5 170
2.5 170 AT
3.0 204
2.0T
3.5
3.5 AWD
SHO
AWD
FWD
SHO

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft ~ 1370 L / 48.4 cu-ft
569 L / 20.1 cu-ft
569 L / 20.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16
255/45 R19
255/45 R19
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
12.1 m / 39.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Liftback Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1429 mm / 56.3 in
1542 mm / 60.7 in
1542 mm / 60.7 in
Size | Length
4731 mm / 186.3 in
5154 mm / 202.9 in
5154 mm / 202.9 in
Size | Width
1812 mm / 71.3 in
1935 mm / 76.2 in | 2177 mm / 85.7 in (mirror unfolded) | 1963 mm / 77.3 in (mirror folded)
1935 mm / 76.2 in | 2177 mm / 85.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
1659.0 mm / 65.3 in
1659.0 mm / 65.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
1664.0 mm / 65.5 in
1664.0 mm / 65.5 in
Wheel Size
16 in
19 in
19 in
Wheelbase
2754 mm / 108.4 in
2868 mm / 112.9 in
2868 mm / 112.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.3
0.3

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
Duratec 35 (Cyclone)
Engine | Bore
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6200 rpm
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic SelectShift
Automatic 6F50

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2019
2009 ~ 2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
29%
23%
21%
Pros
  • Lots of room inside
  • Good value for money
  • Easy to work on
  • Good power output
  • Lots of interior space
  • Increased power output
  • Better interior appointments
  • More imposing exterior design
Cons
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • Unreliable V6 engines (internal water pump)
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Generic exterior design
  • Limited by its basic suspension setup
  • Uninspiring handling
  • Unreliable engines (internal water pump)

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.