Compare Ford B-MAX vs Citroen C3 III vs Citroen C2
Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 120
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.4 Duratec 90
1.5 TDCi 75
1.5 TDCi 95
1.6 Duratec 105 AT
1.2 110 Euro6d
1.2 110
1.2 110 Euro6d AT
1.2 110 AT
1.2 68
1.2 68 Euro6d
1.2 82 Euro6d
1.2 82
1.5 BlueHDi 102
1.6 BlueHDi 75
1.6 BlueHDi 99
1.1i
1.1i Euro4
1.4 HDi
1.4 HDi AT
1.4 HDi Euro4
1.4i 75
1.4i 75 AT
1.4i 90 AT
1.6i 110 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6i 110 AT
1.6i 125
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
318 L / 11.2 cu-ft ~ 1386 L / 48.9 cu-ft
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft ~ 922 L / 32.6 cu-ft
166 L / 5.9 cu-ft ~ 879 L / 31.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
41.0 L / 10.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.3 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1604 mm / 63.1 in
1474 mm / 58.0 in
Size | Length
4077 mm / 160.5 in
3996 mm / 157.3 in
3666 mm / 144.3 in
Size | Width
1751 mm / 68.9 in | 2067 mm / 81.4 in (mirror unfolded) | 1857 mm / 73.1 in (mirror folded)
1749 mm / 68.9 in | 2007 mm / 79.0 in (mirror unfolded) | 1829 mm / 72.0 in (mirror folded)
1659 mm / 65.3 in | 1898 mm / 74.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1492.0 mm / 58.7 in
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1482.0 mm / 58.3 in
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Wheelbase
2489 mm / 98.0 in
2539 mm / 100.0 in
2315 mm / 91.1 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
11%
8%
3%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Easy entry and exit
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Small turning circle
- Easy to drive and park
Cons
- Rather ugly
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poorly put together
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Ugliness in the black plastic flavor
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Ugly
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.