Compare Ford B-MAX vs Mazda 2 II vs Mazda 2 III
Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 120
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.4 Duratec 90
1.5 TDCi 75
1.5 TDCi 95
1.6 Duratec 105 AT
1.3 75
1.3 75 Euro5
1.3 84
1.3 86
1.4 CD
1.5 102
1.5 102 AT
1.5 103
1.5 103 AT
1.6 CD 90
1.6 CD 95
1.5 SkyActiv-D
1.5 SkyActiv-G 115
1.5 SkyActiv-G 75
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
318 L / 11.2 cu-ft ~ 1386 L / 48.9 cu-ft
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft ~ 787 L / 27.8 cu-ft
280 L / 9.9 cu-ft ~ 950 L / 33.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
43.0 L / 11.4 gal
44.0 L / 11.6 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.3 ft
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
150 mm / 5.9 in
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1604 mm / 63.1 in
1495 mm / 58.9 in
Size | Length
4077 mm / 160.5 in
4060 mm / 159.8 in
Size | Width
1751 mm / 68.9 in | 2067 mm / 81.4 in (mirror unfolded) | 1857 mm / 73.1 in (mirror folded)
1695 mm / 66.7 in | 1983 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1492.0 mm / 58.7 in
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1482.0 mm / 58.3 in
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
Wheelbase
2489 mm / 98.0 in
2490 mm / 98.0 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
0.29
Towing Capacity
515 kg / 1135 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1100 kg / 2425 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6
Reviews
Neofiliac score
11%
6%
26%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Easy entry and exit
- Small turning circle
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Very low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Rather ugly
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poorly put together
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Semi-independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.