HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford B-MAX vs Alfa Romeo MiTo vs Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift

Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 120
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.4 Duratec 90
1.5 TDCi 75
1.5 TDCi 95
1.6 Duratec 105 AT
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.3 JTD 90
1.3 JTD 85
1.4
1.4 MPI
1.4 TB MultiAir 105
1.4 TB MultiAir 135
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 155
1.4 TB MultiAir 135 DCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170
1.6 JTD
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
318 L / 11.2 cu-ft ~ 1386 L / 48.9 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.3 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1604 mm / 63.1 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4077 mm / 160.5 in
4063 mm / 160.0 in
Size | Width
1751 mm / 68.9 in | 2067 mm / 81.4 in (mirror unfolded) | 1857 mm / 73.1 in (mirror folded)
1720 mm / 67.7 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1492.0 mm / 58.7 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1482.0 mm / 58.3 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2489 mm / 98.0 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
11%
25%
23%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy entry and exit
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Beautiful design
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Rather ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poorly put together
  • No powerful engine options
  • Very tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.