Compare Ford Mustang 6 vs Subaru BRZ vs Mazda RX-8

Variants
2.3 EcoBoost 309
2.3 EcoBoost 309 AT
2.3 EcoBoost 317
2.3 EcoBoost 317 AT
3.7 V6 304
3.7 V6 304 AT
GT 421
GT 421 AT
GT 426
GT 426 AT
MT
AT
Renesis 2003
40th Anniversary
Revolution High-Power
Challenge High-Power
Type S

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
408 L / 14.4 cu-ft
290 L / 10.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.2 L / 7.6 qt
8.7 L / 9.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.4 L / 5.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
61.0 L / 16.1 gal
Passengers
4
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Hatchback
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Length
4240 mm / 166.9 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1582.0 mm / 62.3 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
36.0 m / 118.1 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
0.28
0.30
Towing Capacity
695 kg / 1532 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine
FA20D
13B
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
1.3 L / 79.8 cu-in / 1308.0 cc
Engine | Power
200.0 hp / 149.1 kW @ 7000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
100.1 hp/L / 1.6 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
205 Nm / 151.2 lb-ft @ 6400-6600 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol rotary2 engine
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed

Production

Availability
2015 ~ 2017
2012 ~ 2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
84%
74%
84%
Pros
  • Superb V8 engine (sound, character, and reliability)
  • Sweet 6-speed manual
  • Front engine, RWD
  • Classic, imposing styling
  • Great value
  • Easy to work on
  • Very durable
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low center of gravity
  • Good balance
  • Compact engine and lightweight chassis
  • Glorious 9000rpm redline
  • Great weight distribution
  • Double-wishbone + multilink suspension setup
  • Great handling characteristics
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Not the best fit and finish
  • Down on engine power
  • MacPherson front suspension
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Not a thoroughbred

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.