Compare Honda Civic VIII 5-door Hatchback vs Alfa Romeo MiTo vs Alfa Romeo Giulietta facelift
Variants
1.4 i-VTEC (100 Hp)
1.4 i-VTEC (100 Hp) i-SHIFT
1.4i (83 Hp)
1.8 i 16V (140 Hp) Automatic
1.8i 16V (140 Hp)
2.2 D (140 Hp)
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.3 JTD 90
1.3 JTD 85
1.4
1.4 MPI
1.4 TB MultiAir 105
1.4 TB MultiAir 135
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 155
1.4 TB MultiAir 135 DCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170
1.6 JTD
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 120 Euro6d
1.4 TB MultiAir 150
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
1.6 MultiJet 120 Euro6d
1.6 MultiJet 120 Euro6d TCT
1.6 MultiJet 120
1.6 MultiJet 120 TCT
1.75 TBi
2.0 MultiJet 170 Euro6d TCT
2.0 MultiJet 150
2.0 MultiJet 175 TCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
350 L / 12.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
3.6 L / 3.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1460 mm / 57.5 in
1465 mm / 57.7 in
Size | Length
4351 mm / 171.3 in
Size | Width
1720 mm / 67.7 in
1798 mm / 70.8 in
Track Width | Front
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
Wheelbase
2511 mm / 98.9 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
L13Z1, L13Z2
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
41%
25%
46%
Pros
- Great styling
- Wonderful engines
- Sweet 6-speed manual transmission
- Fully independent suspension setup
- Low official fuel consumption
- Beautiful design
- Low official fuel consumption
- Sweet design
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Questionable automatic transmission
- No powerful engine options
- Very tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- More emission nonsense causing reliability concerns
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.