HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Honda Fit vs Renault Clio V vs Renault Megane III

Variants
1.2
1.4
1.4 CVT
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 75
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 100 CVT
1.3 TCe 130 EDC
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 85
1.6 E-Tech
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 132
1.2 TCe 132 AT
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 100
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 131
2.0 140 CVT
GT 2.0 dCi 160
GT 2.0 dCi 165
GT 2.0 TCe 180
GT 2.0 TCe 220

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
380 L / 13.4 cu-ft ~ 1323 L / 46.7 cu-ft
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1162 L / 41.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
185/55 R15

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.2 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1525 mm / 60.0 in
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
3830 mm / 150.8 in
4050 mm / 159.4 in
4295 mm / 169.1 in
Size | Width
1675 mm / 65.9 in
Track Width | Front
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1445.0 mm / 56.9 in
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Weight
980.0 kg / 2160.5 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2450 mm / 96.5 in
2583 mm / 101.7 in
2641 mm / 104.0 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 2 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed

Production

Availability
2002 ~ 2008

Reviews

Neofiliac score
16%
19%
20%
Pros
  • Good styling
  • Good Honda L engine
  • Good manual transmission
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Poor performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Questionable CVT and auto gearboxes

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.