Compare Honda Fit vs Renault Clio IV vs Renault Megane III
Variants
1.2
1.4
1.4 CVT
0.9 90
0.9 TCe 90
0.9 TCe 75
1.2 120 AT
1.2 75 Euro6
1.2 75
1.2 TCe 120 AT
1.2 TCe 120
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 75 Euro6
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 90 AT
1.5 dCi 90 Euro6
1.5 dCi 90
RS 200 AT
RS 200 Euro6 AT
RS 220 AT
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 132
1.2 TCe 132 AT
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 100
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 131
2.0 140 CVT
GT 2.0 dCi 160
GT 2.0 dCi 165
GT 2.0 TCe 180
GT 2.0 TCe 220
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
380 L / 13.4 cu-ft ~ 1323 L / 46.7 cu-ft
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1162 L / 41.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
185/55 R15
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1525 mm / 60.0 in
1448 mm / 57.0 in
Size | Length
3830 mm / 150.8 in
4062 mm / 159.9 in
4295 mm / 169.1 in
Size | Width
1675 mm / 65.9 in
Track Width | Front
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1445.0 mm / 56.9 in
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Weight
980.0 kg / 2160.5 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2450 mm / 96.5 in
2589 mm / 101.9 in
2641 mm / 104.0 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 2 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Production
Availability
2002 ~ 2008
Reviews
Neofiliac score
16%
16%
20%
Pros
- Good styling
- Good Honda L engine
- Good manual transmission
- Low fuel consumption
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Decent engine reliability
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- CVT
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Questionable CVT and auto gearboxes
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.