HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Honda Fit vs Mercedes A-Class W169 vs Mercedes CLC CL203

Variants
1.2
1.4
1.4 CVT
A 150
A 150 CVT
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI CVT
A 170
A 170 CVT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI CVT
A 200
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI CVT
A 200 CVT
A 200 Turbo
A 200 Turbo CVT
CLC 160
CLC 160 AT
CLC 180 Kompressor
CLC 180 Kompressor AT
CLC 200 CDI
CLC 200 CDI AT
CLC 200 Kompressor
CLC 200 Kompressor AT
CLC 220 CDI
CLC 220 CDI AT
CLC 230
CLC 230 AT
CLC 250
CLC 250 AT
CLC 350
CLC 350 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
380 L / 13.4 cu-ft ~ 1323 L / 46.7 cu-ft
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft ~ 1995 L / 70.5 cu-ft
310 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
54.0 L / 14.3 gal
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Tire Size
185/55 R15

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height
1525 mm / 60.0 in
1405 mm / 55.3 in
Size | Length
3830 mm / 150.8 in
3838 mm / 151.1 in
Size | Width
1675 mm / 65.9 in
1764 mm / 69.4 in
Track Width | Front
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1445.0 mm / 56.9 in
1476.0 mm / 58.1 in
Weight
980.0 kg / 2160.5 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2450 mm / 96.5 in
2568 mm / 101.1 in
2715 mm / 106.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 engine with 2 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed

Production

Availability
2002 ~ 2008

Reviews

Neofiliac score
16%
1%
31%
Pros
  • Good styling
  • Good Honda L engine
  • Good manual transmission
  • Three-pointed star
  • RWD remained
  • Slight interior improvements
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Poor engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Great insult to the Mercedes name
  • Arguably less appealing than its predecessor
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Cheaply put together

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.