HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Megane III vs Renault Clio IV vs Renault Clio V

Variants
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 132
1.2 TCe 132 AT
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 100
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 131
2.0 140 CVT
GT 2.0 dCi 160
GT 2.0 dCi 165
GT 2.0 TCe 180
GT 2.0 TCe 220
0.9 90
0.9 TCe 90
0.9 TCe 75
1.2 120 AT
1.2 75 Euro6
1.2 75
1.2 TCe 120 AT
1.2 TCe 120
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 75 Euro6
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 90 AT
1.5 dCi 90 Euro6
1.5 dCi 90
RS 200 AT
RS 200 Euro6 AT
RS 220 AT
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 75
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 100 CVT
1.3 TCe 130 EDC
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 85
1.6 E-Tech

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1162 L / 41.0 cu-ft
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.2 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1448 mm / 57.0 in
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4295 mm / 169.1 in
4062 mm / 159.9 in
4050 mm / 159.4 in
Track Width | Front
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Wheelbase
2641 mm / 104.0 in
2589 mm / 101.9 in
2583 mm / 101.7 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
20%
16%
19%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Questionable CVT and auto gearboxes
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Poor performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.