HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Megane III vs Subaru Impreza 4 Hatchback vs Lexus CT 200h

Variants
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 132
1.2 TCe 132 AT
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 100
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 131
2.0 140 CVT
GT 2.0 dCi 160
GT 2.0 dCi 165
GT 2.0 TCe 180
GT 2.0 TCe 220
1.6i AWD
1.6i AWD CVT
1.6i FWD
1.6i FWD CVT
2.0i AWD
2.0i AWD CVT
Euro6
Euro5

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1162 L / 41.0 cu-ft
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft ~ 985 L / 34.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.9 L / 7.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.8 L / 5.1 qt
4.2 L / 4.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door hybrid Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
145 mm / 5.7 in
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1465 mm / 57.7 in
Size | Length
4295 mm / 169.1 in
Size | Width
1740 mm / 68.5 in
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2641 mm / 104.0 in
2645 mm / 104.1 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.8 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine
2ZR-FXE
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1798.0 cc
Engine | Power
99.0 hp / 73.8 kW @ 5200 rpm + 82.0 hp / 61.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Specific Output
55.1 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
88.3 mm / 3.5 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
20%
42%
31%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Much sleeker styling
  • Higher engine output
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Questionable CVT and auto gearboxes
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Bad CVT
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Poor handling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.