HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Twingo II vs Renault Twizy vs BMW i3 I01

Variants
1.2 58
1.2 76
1.2 GT 100
1.2 75 Euro5
1.5 dCi 64
RS 1.6 133
22 kWh
22 kWh + Range Extender

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
31 L / 1.1 cu-ft
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
9.0 L / 2.4 gal
Passengers
4
2
4
Payload
216 kg / 476 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 214 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 204 mm
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
MacPherson, Transverse stabilizer
Multi-link
Tire Size
Front wheel tires: 125/80 R13 Rear wheel tires: 145/80 R13
Turning Circle
6.8 m / 22.3 ft
9.9 m / 32.3 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
6.1 kWh (gross)
22.0 kWh (gross) | 18.8 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Body Style
3-door Hatchback
2-door battery-electric Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1454 mm / 57.2 in
1578 mm / 62.1 in
Size | Length
2338 mm / 92.0 in
3999 mm / 157.4 in
Size | Width
1237 mm / 48.7 in | 1381 mm / 54.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1094.0 mm / 43.1 in
1571.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1080.0 mm / 42.5 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Weight
474.0 kg / 1045.0 lbs
Wheelbase
1686 mm / 66.4 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
13 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.64
Electric Range
170.0 km / 105.6 mi
Fuel Economy
0.6 L/100km / 392.0 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph, 80.0 km/h / 49.7 mph (EV mode)
150.0 km/h / 93.2 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Power
17 hp / 12.7 kW
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Automatic

Production

Availability
2012
2013 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
14%
28%
6%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Stylish design
  • Very small turning circle
  • Fun looks
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Over low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Not a real car
  • Horrid 0.64 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Very little cargo space
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Miserable electric range
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.