HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Zoe vs BMW i3 LCI vs BMW i3 I01

Variants
Q210
Q90
R110
R240
R75
R90 22kWh
R90 41kWh
33.2 kWh
33.2 kWh Range Extender
42.2 kWh
22 kWh
22 kWh + Range Extender

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
338 L / 11.9 cu-ft ~ 1225 L / 43.3 cu-ft
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
9.0 L / 2.4 gal
9.0 L / 2.4 gal
Passengers
5
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
9.9 m / 32.3 ft
9.9 m / 32.3 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
22.0 kWh (gross) | 18.8 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
139 mm / 5.5 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1562 mm / 61.5 in
1598 mm / 62.9 in
1578 mm / 62.1 in
Size | Length
4084 mm / 160.8 in
4011 mm / 157.9 in
3999 mm / 157.4 in
Size | Width
1730 mm / 68.1 in | 1945 mm / 76.6 in (mirror unfolded)
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
1571.0 mm / 61.9 in
1571.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2588 mm / 101.9 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
13 g/km
Electric Range
170.0 km / 105.6 mi
Fuel Economy
0.6 L/100km / 392.0 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
135.0 km/h / 83.9 mph
150.0 km/h / 93.2 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
18%
11%
6%
Pros
  • Stylish design
  • Easy to drive and park in big cities
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Over low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Short electric range
  • Air-cooled battery
  • Very, very ugly
  • Nonsense positioning
  • Greenwashing
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Miserable electric range
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.