HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Clio IV vs Renault Megane 4 facelift vs Renault Megane III

Variants
0.9 90
0.9 TCe 90
0.9 TCe 75
1.2 120 AT
1.2 75 Euro6
1.2 75
1.2 TCe 120 AT
1.2 TCe 120
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 75 Euro6
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 90 AT
1.5 dCi 90 Euro6
1.5 dCi 90
RS 200 AT
RS 200 Euro6 AT
RS 220 AT
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 EDC
1.3 TCe 160
1.3 TCe 160 EDC
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 115 EDC
RS EDC
RS
RS Trophy
RS Trophy EDC
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 132
1.2 TCe 132 AT
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 100
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 131
2.0 140 CVT
GT 2.0 dCi 160
GT 2.0 dCi 165
GT 2.0 TCe 180
GT 2.0 TCe 220

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1162 L / 41.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 260x6 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
101 mm / 4.0 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1448 mm / 57.0 in
Size | Length
4062 mm / 159.9 in
4295 mm / 169.1 in
Track Width | Front
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheelbase
2589 mm / 101.9 in
2641 mm / 104.0 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Production

Availability
2020 ~ 2022

Reviews

Neofiliac score
16%
44%
20%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent styling
  • Last chance to get the RS version
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup (no independent rear suspensions)
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Questionable CVT and auto gearboxes

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.