HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Clio IV vs Renault Megane 3 Coupe vs Renault Clio V

Variants
0.9 90
0.9 TCe 90
0.9 TCe 75
1.2 120 AT
1.2 75 Euro6
1.2 75
1.2 TCe 120 AT
1.2 TCe 120
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 75 Euro6
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 90 AT
1.5 dCi 90 Euro6
1.5 dCi 90
RS 200 AT
RS 200 Euro6 AT
RS 220 AT
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 132 AT
1.2 TCe 132
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110 CVT
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 110
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 130 Euro6
1.9 dCi 130
2.0 140 CVT
1.2 TCe 115
2.0 dCi 160
2.0 dCi 165
2.0 TCe 180
2.0 TCe 190
2.0 TCe 220
RS 265
RS 250
RS Trophy
RS Trophy-R
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 75
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 100 CVT
1.3 TCe 130 EDC
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 85
1.6 E-Tech

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Torsion
Semi-independent

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.2 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1448 mm / 57.0 in
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4062 mm / 159.9 in
4299 mm / 169.3 in
4050 mm / 159.4 in
Track Width | Front
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Wheelbase
2589 mm / 101.9 in
2583 mm / 101.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.34

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
16%
37%
19%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent styling
  • Interesting Megane RS
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Awkward styling
  • Poor interiors
  • Poor performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.