Compare Renault Clio III vs Renault Megane III vs Subaru Impreza 5 (GT)

Renault Clio III

Renault Megane III

Subaru Impreza 5 (GT)

Renault Clio IIIRenault Megane IIISubaru Impreza 5 (GT)
Variants
1.2 59
1.2 75
1.2 75 AT
1.2 78 AT
1.2 TCe
1.2i 101
1.2i 65
1.4 98
1.5 dCi 105
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 86
1.5 dCi 86 AT
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 88
2.0 138
2.0 138 AT
2.0 197
RS
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 132
1.2 TCe 132 AT
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 100
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 131
2.0 140 CVT
GT 2.0 dCi 160
GT 2.0 dCi 165
GT 2.0 TCe 180
GT 2.0 TCe 220
1.6i CVT
2.0i CVT

Reviews

Neofiliac score9%20%32%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Good front-end styling
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable transmissions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Questionable CVT and auto gearboxes
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Bad CVT
  • Hybrid nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.