Compare Citroen C3 II vs Citroen C1 II 5-door vs Citroen C3 III

Citroen C3 II

Citroen C1 II 5-door

Citroen C3 III

Citroen C3 IICitroen C1 II 5-doorCitroen C3 III
Variants
1.0 68
1.1 60
1.2 110
1.2 82
1.2 82 AT
1.4 95
1.4 95 AT
1.4 95 AT
1.4 e-HDi 68 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 68 2013+
1.4i 73
1.6 120
1.6 120 2013+
1.6 120 AT
1.6 120 AT 2013+
1.6 BlueHDi 75
1.6 BlueHDI 99
1.6 e-HDI 114 AT
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDI 92 2013+
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 e-HDI 92 AT 2013+
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.0 69
1.0 69 ETG
1.0 72
1.0 72 ETG
1.2 82
Airscape 1.0 72
1.2 110 Euro6d
1.2 110
1.2 110 Euro6d AT
1.2 110 AT
1.2 68
1.2 68 Euro6d
1.2 82 Euro6d
1.2 82
1.5 BlueHDi 102
1.6 BlueHDi 75
1.6 BlueHDi 99

Reviews

Neofiliac score13%14%8%
Pros
  • Good 0.29 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bug ugly
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Ugliness in the black plastic flavor

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.