Compare Citroen C4 vs Citroen DS4 vs Citroen C3 III facelift
Variants
1.4 88
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 109 AT
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 THP 140 AT
1.6 THP 150
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
1.6i 109
1.6i 109 AT
2.0 HDi 136 5MP
2.0 HDi 136 6MP
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 140
2.0i 140
2.0i 140 AT
1.2 130
1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 e-HDi 112
1.6 e-HDi 112 AT
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 115 AT
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 156
1.6 THP 163 AT
1.6 THP 165 AT
1.6 THP 200
1.6 VTi 120
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 181 AT
2.0 HDi 163
2.0 HDi 163 AT
1.2 110
1.2 110 AT
1.2 83
1.5 HDi 102
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
320 L / 11.3 cu-ft ~ 1023 L / 36.1 cu-ft
385 L / 13.6 cu-ft ~ 1021 L / 36.1 cu-ft
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1533 mm / 60.4 in
1474 mm / 58.0 in
Size | Length
4275 mm / 168.3 in
3996 mm / 157.3 in
Size | Width
1773 mm / 69.8 in | 1964 mm / 77.3 in (mirror unfolded)
1749 mm / 68.9 in | 2007 mm / 79.0 in (mirror unfolded) | 1829 mm / 72.0 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Wheel Size
15 in, 16 in, 17 in
Wheelbase
2608 mm / 102.7 in
2612 mm / 102.8 in
2539 mm / 100.0 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6d-ISC
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
16%
18%
8%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Decent engine reliability
- Low official fuel consumption
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspension
- Ugly
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.