Compare Mazda 3 II Hatchback vs Mini Hatch R56 vs Mazda 2 III
Variants
1.6 CD 109
1.6 CD 115
1.6 105
1.6 105 AT
2.0 CD 150
2.0 DISI 150
2.0 150 AT
2.2 CD 185
2.5 167
2.5 167 AT
MPS / Mazdaspeed3
Cooper 122PS
Cooper 122PS AT
Cooper 120PS
Cooper D 110PS
Cooper D 110PS AT
Cooper D 112PS
Cooper D 112PS AT
Cooper S 184PS
Cooper S 184PS AT
Cooper S 175PS
Cooper SD
Cooper SD AT
JCW
One 75PS
One MINIMALIST 75PS
One 98PS
One 98PS AT
One MINIMALIST 98PS
One D
1.5 SkyActiv-D
1.5 SkyActiv-G 115
1.5 SkyActiv-G 75
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
160 L / 5.7 cu-ft ~ 680 L / 24.0 cu-ft
280 L / 9.9 cu-ft ~ 950 L / 33.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.5 L / 7.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
44.0 L / 11.6 gal
Passengers
5
4
5
Payload
450 kg / 992 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1407 mm / 55.4 in
1495 mm / 58.9 in
Size | Length
4060 mm / 159.8 in
Size | Width
1683 mm / 66.3 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in | 1983 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2467 mm / 97.1 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Towing Capacity
515 kg / 1135 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1100 kg / 2425 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine
L5-VE
Engine | Redline
6200 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
47%
26%
26%
Pros
- Rather beautifully styled
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Small turning circle
- Strong engine lineup
- Iconic design
- Low official fuel consumption
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Very low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Unreliable small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Semi-independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.