HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Chevrolet Volt vs Chevrolet Cruze 2 Hatchback vs Chrysler PT Cruiser

Variants
16.0 kWh
17.1 kWh
1.4
1.4 AT
1.4 Turbo AT
1.6 TD
1.6 TD AT
1.6
2.0 141PS
2.0 141PS AT
2.0 150PS
2.0 150PS AT
2.2D 150PS
2.2D 121PS
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4T 182PS
2.4T 182PS AT
2.4T 220PS
2.4T 220PS AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.3 L / 7.7 qt
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
3.5 L / 3.7 qt
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
35.2 L / 9.3 gal
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
4
5
5
Payload
364 kg / 802 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-dependent beam with stabilizer lateral stability, Trailing arm, Coil spring
Semi-independent
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door plug-in hybrid Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1430 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
4498 mm / 177.1 in
4453 mm / 175.3 in
Size | Width
1788 mm / 70.4 in
1791 mm / 70.5 in
Track Width | Front
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1578.0 mm / 62.1 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17
Wheelbase
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
6.3 L/100km / 37.3 MPG (combined)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
73.4 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.4 L / 85.3 cu-in / 1398.0 cc
Engine | Power
84.0 hp / 62.6 kW @ 4800 rpm + 149.0 hp / 111.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Redline
4800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
60.1 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
82.6 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
Multi-mode electric

Production

Availability
2017 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
25%
20%
2%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Slightly improved styling
  • Good fuel economy ratings
  • So ugly that it's an icon
Cons
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Complex drivetrain
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Not independent rear suspensions
  • Truly epitomizes ugliness

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.