Compare Chevrolet Volt vs Chevrolet Cruze 2 Hatchback vs Dodge Caliber
Variants
16.0 kWh
17.1 kWh
1.4
1.4 AT
1.4 Turbo AT
1.6 TD
1.6 TD AT
1.8
2.0d 140PS
2.0
2.4
SRT-4
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
524 L / 18.5 cu-ft ~ 1360 L / 48.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.3 L / 7.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
3.5 L / 3.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
35.2 L / 9.3 gal
Passengers
4
5
Payload
364 kg / 802 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-dependent beam with stabilizer lateral stability, Trailing arm, Coil spring
Trailing arm
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door plug-in hybrid Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1430 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
4498 mm / 177.1 in
4453 mm / 175.3 in
Size | Width
1788 mm / 70.4 in
1791 mm / 70.5 in
Track Width | Front
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1578.0 mm / 62.1 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17
75J x 19
Wheelbase
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2635 mm / 103.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
6.3 L/100km / 37.3 MPG (combined)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
73.4 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.4 L / 85.3 cu-in / 1398.0 cc
Engine | Power
84.0 hp / 62.6 kW @ 4800 rpm + 149.0 hp / 111.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Redline
4800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
60.1 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
82.6 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
Multi-mode electric
Manual
Production
Availability
2017 ~ 2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
25%
20%
27%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Slightly improved styling
- Good fuel economy ratings
- Unique design (though not pretty)
- SRT-4
Cons
- Miserably low engine output
- Complex drivetrain
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Basic suspension setup
- CVT
- Unreliable engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.