HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Chevrolet Volt vs Chevrolet Cruze Hatchback vs Chevrolet Sonic 2 facelift

Variants
16.0 kWh
17.1 kWh
1.4
1.4 Turbo
1.4 Turbo AT
1.6
1.7 TD 110
1.7 TD 130
1.8 AT
1.8
2.0 TD AT
2.0 TD
1.4
1.4 AT
1.8
1.8 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
413 L / 14.6 cu-ft ~ 883 L / 31.2 cu-ft
539 L / 19.0 cu-ft ~ 1351 L / 47.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.3 L / 7.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
3.5 L / 3.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
35.2 L / 9.3 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
Passengers
4
5
5
Payload
364 kg / 802 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door plug-in hybrid Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1430 mm / 56.3 in
1477 mm / 58.1 in
1506 mm / 59.3 in
Size | Length
4498 mm / 177.1 in
4059 mm / 159.8 in
Size | Width
1788 mm / 70.4 in
1735 mm / 68.3 in
Track Width | Front
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1509.0 mm / 59.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1578.0 mm / 62.1 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
1509.0 mm / 59.4 in
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17
Wheelbase
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2525 mm / 99.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.33
Fuel Economy
6.3 L/100km / 37.3 MPG (combined)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
73.4 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.4 L / 85.3 cu-in / 1398.0 cc
Engine | Power
84.0 hp / 62.6 kW @ 4800 rpm + 149.0 hp / 111.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Redline
4800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
60.1 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
82.6 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
Multi-mode electric

Reviews

Neofiliac score
25%
19%
20%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Rather good automatic transmissions
  • Decent exterior design
  • OKish engine reliability
Cons
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Complex drivetrain
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Somewhat ugly
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Nasty interior

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.