HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Chevrolet Bolt EV vs Renault Twingo III facelift vs Peugeot 208 II

Variants
60 kWh
66 kWh
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 75
e-208 50 kWh
1.2 PureTech 100 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
478 L / 16.9 cu-ft ~ 1603 L / 56.6 cu-ft
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 276 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 264 mm
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent
Elastic beam
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
8.8 m / 28.7 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
50.0 kWh (gross) | 46.0 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
350.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1430 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
4166 mm / 164.0 in
4055 mm / 159.6 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
Weight
1616.0 kg / 3562.7 lbs
Wheelbase
2492 mm / 98.1 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.5 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.308
Electric Range
350.0 km / 217.5 mi
Top Speed
145.0 km/h / 90.1 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Euro 6 d-TEMP
Engine | Power
200 hp / 149.1 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
3%
16%
Pros
  • Notable improvement in range
  • Very small turning circle
  • Improved styling
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Ugly
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Miserable electric range
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • The bus is much better
  • Horrible styling
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor build quality
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.