HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Chevrolet Bolt EV vs Peugeot 208 II vs Peugeot 308

Variants
60 kWh
66 kWh
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 75
e-208 50 kWh
1.2 PureTech 100 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 98
1.6 e-HDi 112
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 150 AT
1.6 THP 156
1.6 THP 156 AT
1.6 THP 175
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 163 AT
GTi 200

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
478 L / 16.9 cu-ft ~ 1603 L / 56.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 276 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 264 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Elastic beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
50.0 kWh (gross) | 46.0 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
350.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1430 mm / 56.3 in
1498 mm / 59.0 in
Size | Length
4166 mm / 164.0 in
4055 mm / 159.6 in
4276 mm / 168.3 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
1526.0 mm / 60.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1501.0 mm / 59.1 in
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
1521.0 mm / 59.9 in
Weight
1616.0 kg / 3562.7 lbs
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2608 mm / 102.7 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.5 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.308
0.28
Electric Range
350.0 km / 217.5 mi
Top Speed
145.0 km/h / 90.1 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 d-TEMP
Engine | Power
200 hp / 149.1 kW
Engine | Redline
5000 rpm
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
17%
16%
18%
Pros
  • Notable improvement in range
  • Improved styling
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Ugly
  • Horrible styling
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor build quality
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.