Compare Chevrolet Spark EV vs Peugeot 207 vs Peugeot 208 II

Variants
1.4 73
1.4 75
1.4 90
1.4 90 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 95 Euro5
1.6 110
1.6 120
1.6 120 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
RC
RC Euro5
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 75
e-208 50 kWh
1.2 PureTech 100 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
272 L / 9.6 cu-ft ~ 663 L / 23.4 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
4
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Elastic beam
Tire Size
185/55 R15, 195/55 R15
Turning Circle
10.3 m / 33.8 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
21.0 kWh (gross)
50.0 kWh (gross) | 46.0 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1590 mm / 62.6 in
1472 mm / 58.0 in
1430 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
3721 mm / 146.5 in
4055 mm / 159.6 in
Size | Width
1626 mm / 64.0 in
Track Width | Front
1410.0 mm / 55.5 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1392.0 mm / 54.8 in
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
Weight
1300.0 kg / 2866.0 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2375 mm / 93.5 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.6 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.2 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Electric Range
350.0 km / 217.5 mi
Top Speed
145.0 km/h / 90.1 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 d-TEMP
Engine | Power
143 hp / 106.6 kW
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2016
2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
6%
8%
16%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Cute EV
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Horrible range
  • Poor battery degradation
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable transmissions
  • Horrible styling
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor build quality
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.