HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Skoda Fabia 2 vs Volkswagen NEW Beetle 9C facelift vs Volkswagen Polo 6 facelift

Variants
1.2 60 Euro5
1.2 70 Euro5
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 TDI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 86 Euro5
1.4 86
1.4 TDI 70
1.4 TDI 80
1.6 105
1.6 105 AT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 75
1.6 TDI 90
1.9 TDI 105
RS
1.4
1.6
1.8 Turbo
1.9 TDI
2.0
2.0 AT
1.0 TGI 90
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 DSG
GTI DSG

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
209 L / 7.4 cu-ft ~ 769 L / 27.2 cu-ft
351 L / 12.4 cu-ft ~ 1125 L / 39.7 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
5
4
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
10.0 m / 32.8 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1498 mm / 59.0 in
1498 mm / 59.0 in
Size | Length
4129 mm / 162.6 in
4074 mm / 160.4 in
Size | Width
1642 mm / 64.6 in
1721 mm / 67.8 in
Track Width | Front
1507.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1487.0 mm / 58.5 in
Wheelbase
2515 mm / 99.0 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
0.38
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
600 kg / 1323 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1000 kg / 2205 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1

Production

Availability
2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score
11%
22%
25%
Pros
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • So ugly it's loved by many
  • Decent handling
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • High 0.38 drag coefficient
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.