Compare Skoda Fabia 2 vs Mercedes A-Class W169 vs Skoda Fabia 3

Variants
1.2 60 Euro5
1.2 70 Euro5
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 TDI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 86 Euro5
1.4 86
1.4 TDI 70
1.4 TDI 80
1.6 105
1.6 105 AT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 75
1.6 TDI 90
1.9 TDI 105
RS
A 150
A 150 CVT
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI CVT
A 170
A 170 CVT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI CVT
A 200
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI CVT
A 200 CVT
A 200 Turbo
A 200 Turbo CVT
1.0 60
1.0 75
1.0 60 2019+
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 2018+
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 110 DSG 2018+
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 2018+
1.0 TSI 95 DSG 2020+
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DSG
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DSG

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft ~ 1995 L / 70.5 cu-ft
330 L / 11.7 cu-ft ~ 1150 L / 40.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
54.0 L / 14.3 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
10.0 m / 32.8 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1498 mm / 59.0 in
1467 mm / 57.8 in
Size | Length
3838 mm / 151.1 in
Size | Width
1642 mm / 64.6 in
1764 mm / 69.4 in
Wheelbase
2568 mm / 101.1 in
2470 mm / 97.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
11%
1%
14%
Pros
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Three-pointed star
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Great insult to the Mercedes name
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.