Compare Skoda Fabia 2 vs Hyundai i30 III Hatchback facelift vs Skoda Scala

Variants
1.2 60 Euro5
1.2 70 Euro5
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 TDI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 86 Euro5
1.4 86
1.4 TDI 70
1.4 TDI 80
1.6 105
1.6 105 AT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 75
1.6 TDI 90
1.9 TDI 105
RS
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi DCT
1.5 DPi
1.5 T-GDi
1.5 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
i30 N Performance
i30 N Performance DCT
1.0
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI
1.6 TDI DSG
Edition S

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 345 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 314 mm
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
235/35 R19 Y
Turning Circle
10.0 m / 32.8 ft
11.7 m / 38.2 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
149 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1498 mm / 59.0 in
1471 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4340 mm / 170.9 in
4362 mm / 171.7 in
Size | Width
1642 mm / 64.6 in
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Track Width | Front
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Wheel Size
8.0J x 19
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2649 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
34.6 m / 113.5 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
11%
32%
12%
Pros
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent build quality
  • Decent performance
  • Good handling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Ugly
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling and comfort

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.