Compare Skoda Rapid Spaceback vs Volkswagen Up vs Volkswagen Polo 6

Variants
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 AT
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 86
1.2 TSI 90
1.2 TSI 90 DSG
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 AT
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 122 DSG
1.4 TSI 125 AT
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.4i 90
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.6i 110 Hp
1.6i 110 AT
1.0 60
1.0 60 AT
1.0 75
1.0 75 AT
1.0 CNG
1.0 65
1.0 65 Euro6d
1.0 75
1.0 MPI 80
1.0 TGI 90
1.0 TGI 90 Euro6d
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 116
1.0 TSI 116 DSG
1.0 TSI 95 Euro6d
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 Euro6d DSG
1.0 TSI 95 DSG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.6 TDI 80
1.6 TDI 95
1.6 TDI 95 DSG
GTI
GTI DSG
GTI Euro6d DSG
GTI R5 AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
251 L / 8.9 cu-ft ~ 951 L / 33.6 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
3.4 L / 3.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
5
4
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
16.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
134 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1489 mm / 58.6 in
Size | Length
3540 mm / 139.4 in
Size | Width
1706 mm / 67.2 in
1645 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1428.0 mm / 56.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1424.0 mm / 56.1 in
Wheelbase
2420 mm / 95.3 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
75.5 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-3 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
8%
11%
28%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Fuel efficient
  • Easy to drive and park
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.