HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Skoda Rapid Spaceback vs Volvo V40 Hatchback vs Chrysler PT Cruiser

Variants
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 AT
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 86
1.2 TSI 90
1.2 TSI 90 DSG
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 AT
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 122 DSG
1.4 TSI 125 AT
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.4i 90
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.6i 110 Hp
1.6i 110 AT
D2 115PS
D2 115PS AT
D2 120PS
D2 120PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 177PS
D4 177PS AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
T2 120PS
T2 122PS
T2 122PS AT
T3 150PS
T3 152PS
T3 152PS AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T5 213PS AT
T5 245PS AT
T5 254PS AT
1.6
2.0 141PS
2.0 141PS AT
2.0 150PS
2.0 150PS AT
2.2D 150PS
2.2D 121PS
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4T 182PS
2.4T 182PS AT
2.4T 220PS
2.4T 220PS AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
16.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Independent, spring
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
134 mm / 5.3 in
133 mm / 5.2 in
Size | Length
4369 mm / 172.0 in
Size | Width
1706 mm / 67.2 in
Wheelbase
2647 mm / 104.2 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
8%
35%
2%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good design from many angles
  • Good transmissions
  • Volvo's iconic I5 engine
  • So ugly that it's an icon
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very ugly
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Not independent rear suspensions
  • Truly epitomizes ugliness

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.