Compare Skoda Rapid (NH3) vs Honda Accord 9 (CR/CT) vs Skoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) facelift

Skoda Rapid (NH3)

Honda Accord 9 (CR/CT)

Skoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) facelift

Skoda Rapid (NH3)Honda Accord 9 (CR/CT)Skoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) facelift
Variants
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 AT
1.2 MPI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.2 TSI 90 DSG
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 AT
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125 AT
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.6 MPI 110
1.6 MPI 110 AT
1.6 MPI 90
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 105
2.0 PHEV
2.4
2.4 CVT
3.5
3.5 AT
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV

Reviews

Neofiliac score13%25%42%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Superb exterior styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No fully independent suspensions
  • Downgrade of suspension setup
  • Wide use of CVTs
  • No longer built with enthusiasts in mind
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • PHEV nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.