HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Peugeot 208 vs Peugeot 208 II vs Renault Twingo III facelift

Variants
1.0 PureTech
1.0 PureTech 2016+
1.0 VTi
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 110 AT
1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d AT
1.2 PureTech 82
1.2 PureTech 82 AT
1.2 PureTech 82 Euro6d
1.2 VTi 82
1.4 e-HDi
1.4 HDi
1.4 VTi 95
1.5 BlueHDi 102
1.6 BlueHDi 100
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 BlueHDi 75
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 92 5MT
1.6 e-HDi 92 6MT
1.6 THP 155
1.6 THP 208
1.6 VTi 120
GTi 200
GTi 208
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 75
e-208 50 kWh
1.2 PureTech 100 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
0.9 TCe
0.9 TCe EDC
1.0 SCe 65
1.0 SCe 73
Z.E.

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
174 L / 6.1 cu-ft ~ 980 L / 34.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Elastic beam
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
8.8 m / 28.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
50.0 kWh (gross) | 46.0 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Size | Height
1430 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
4055 mm / 159.6 in
Size | Width
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Front
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
1452.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Wheelbase
2538 mm / 99.9 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2492 mm / 98.1 in

Performance

Electric Range
350.0 km / 217.5 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 d-TEMP
Euro 6d-TEMP

Production

Availability
2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
13%
16%
3%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Improved styling
  • Small turning circle
  • Very small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible styling
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor build quality
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Miserable electric range
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • The bus is much better

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.