HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Peugeot 207 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift vs Alfa Romeo Giulietta facelift

Variants
1.4 73
1.4 75
1.4 90
1.4 90 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 95 Euro5
1.6 110
1.6 120
1.6 120 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
RC
RC Euro5
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 120 Euro6d
1.4 TB MultiAir 150
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
1.6 MultiJet 120 Euro6d
1.6 MultiJet 120 Euro6d TCT
1.6 MultiJet 120
1.6 MultiJet 120 TCT
1.75 TBi
2.0 MultiJet 170 Euro6d TCT
2.0 MultiJet 150
2.0 MultiJet 175 TCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
350 L / 12.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1472 mm / 58.0 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1465 mm / 57.7 in
Size | Length
4063 mm / 160.0 in
4351 mm / 171.3 in
Size | Width
1720 mm / 67.7 in
1798 mm / 70.8 in
Track Width | Front
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
8%
23%
46%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Sweet design
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable transmissions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail
  • More emission nonsense causing reliability concerns
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.