HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Peugeot 207 vs Honda CR-Z vs Honda Fit 4

Variants
1.4 73
1.4 75
1.4 90
1.4 90 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 95 Euro5
1.6 110
1.6 120
1.6 120 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
RC
RC Euro5
1.3 AWD
1.3
1.5 e:HEV
1.5 e:HEV AWD
Crosstar 1.3 AWD
Crosstar 1.3 CVT
Crosstar 1.5 e:HEV
Crosstar 1.5 e:HEV AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
225 L / 7.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
5
4
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent
Tire Size
195/55 R16
Turning Circle
12.6 m / 41.3 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height
1472 mm / 58.0 in
1395 mm / 54.9 in
Size | Length
4078 mm / 160.6 in
Size | Width
2013 mm / 79.3 in
Track Width | Front
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Weight
1147.0 kg / 2528.7 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2435 mm / 95.9 in
2530 mm / 99.6 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.4 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Fuel Economy
5.0 L/100km / 47.0 MPG (combined) | 6.1 L/100km / 38.6 MPG (urban) | 4.4 L/100km / 53.5 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.4:1
13.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 91.4 cu-in / 1497.0 cc
Engine | Power
114.0 hp / 85.0 kW @ 6100 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
76.2 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
145 Nm / 106.9 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
CVT

Production

Availability
2010 ~ 2016
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
8%
35%
17%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Great styling
  • Punchy petrol engine
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Still has I4 engines
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable transmissions
  • Slow and sluggish
  • CVT
  • Basic hybrid setup
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.