Compare Peugeot 207 vs Citroen C3 II vs Citroen C1 II 3-door

Variants
1.4 73
1.4 75
1.4 90
1.4 90 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 95 Euro5
1.6 110
1.6 120
1.6 120 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
RC
RC Euro5
1.0 68
1.1 60
1.2 110
1.2 82
1.2 82 AT
1.4 95
1.4 95 AT
1.4 95 AT
1.4 e-HDi 68 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 68 2013+
1.4i 73
1.6 120
1.6 120 2013+
1.6 120 AT
1.6 120 AT 2013+
1.6 BlueHDi 75
1.6 BlueHDI 99
1.6 e-HDI 114 AT
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDI 92 2013+
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 e-HDI 92 AT 2013+
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.0 69
1.0 69 AT
1.2 82
1.0 72
1.0 72 Euro6d

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
196 L / 6.9 cu-ft ~ 780 L / 27.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
3.6 L / 3.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
35.0 L / 9.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
9.6 m / 31.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1472 mm / 58.0 in
1460 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
3941 mm / 155.2 in
Size | Width
1615 mm / 63.6 in | 1884 mm / 74.2 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1420.0 mm / 55.9 in
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2466 mm / 97.1 in
2340 mm / 92.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
5-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
8%
13%
12%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good 0.29 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable transmissions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bug ugly
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.