Compare Peugeot 207 vs SEAT Ibiza 5 vs SETA Ibiza 4 SportsCoupe
Variants
1.4 73
1.4 75
1.4 90
1.4 90 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 95 Euro5
1.6 110
1.6 120
1.6 120 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
RC
RC Euro5
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 115 Euro6d DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 65
1.0 75
1.0 80
1.0 80 Euro6d
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.0 TGI 90 CNG
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 90
1.6 TDI 80
1.6 TDI 95
1.6 TDI 95 Euro6d
1.6 TDI 95 DSG
1.0 75
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 70 Euro5
1.2 70 Euro5
1.2 TDI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 85
1.4 85 Euro5
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 75
1.4 TDI 80
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TFSI 180 Cupra
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG FR
1.4 TSI 180 DSG Cupra
1.6 105
1.6 105 DSG
1.6 81
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.8 TSI 192 Cupra
1.9 TDI 105
1.9 TDI 90
2.0 TDI 143
2.0 TDI 143 FR
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1472 mm / 58.0 in
1444 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4059 mm / 159.8 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in | 1942 mm / 76.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1693 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2564 mm / 100.9 in
2469 mm / 97.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
8%
17%
17%
Pros
- Small turning circle
- Low fuel consumption
- Low official fuel consumption
- More coherent design than Mk4
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small, unreliable engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Unreliable transmissions
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small, unreliable engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Basic suspension setup
- Somewhat ugly
- Only available with small engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.