Compare Seat Leon 3 vs SEAT Leon 4 vs Hyundai i30 III Hatchback facelift

Variants
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 86
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DSG
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 TGI 110
1.4 TGI 110 CNG
1.4 TGI 110 CNG DSG
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TGI 130
1.5 TGI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 105 DSG
1.6 TDI 110
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 115 DSG
1.6 TDI 90
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6 DSG
2.0 TDI 184
2.0 TDI 184 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 265
Cupra 2.0 TSI 265 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 280
Cupra 2.0 TSI 280 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 290
Cupra 2.0 TSI 290 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 300
Cupra 2.0 TSI 300 DSG
Cupra R 2.0 TSI 310
1.0 eTSI DSG
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 90
1.4 e-HYBRID DSG
1.5 eTSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
2.0 TDI 115
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TSI DSG
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi DCT
1.5 DPi
1.5 T-GDi
1.5 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
i30 N Performance
i30 N Performance DCT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 345 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 314 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/35 R19 Y
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
11.7 m / 38.2 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
12.8 kWh (gross)

Dimensions

Size | Length
4368 mm / 172.0 in
4340 mm / 170.9 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Wheel Size
8.0J x 19
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
34.6 m / 113.5 ft
Electric Range
58.0 km / 36.0 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
24%
17%
32%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Looks fine from some angles
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Less ugly than before
  • Decent build quality
  • Decent performance
  • Good handling
Cons
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poorly built
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.