HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare SEAT Toledo 4 vs SEAT Exeo vs Toyota Avensis 3

Variants
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.2
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 TDI
1.4 TDI DSG
1.4 TSI 122 DSG
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.6 SRE
1.8 SRE T
1.8 TSI 160PS
2.0 TDI 143PS
2.0 TDI 170PS
2.0 TDI 120PS
2.0 TSI 200PS
2.0 TSI 211PS
1.6
1.8
1.8 CVT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0D
2.2D
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 177hp

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
509 L / 18.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link, trapezoidal lever
Turning Circle
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
5-door Sedan
Platform
Volkswagen B7

Dimensions

Size | Height
1461 mm / 57.5 in
1430 mm / 56.3 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4482 mm / 176.5 in
4661 mm / 183.5 in
4695 mm / 184.8 in
Size | Width
1706 mm / 67.2 in
1772 mm / 69.8 in
1810 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1463.0 mm / 57.6 in
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
1523.0 mm / 60.0 in
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2602 mm / 102.4 in
2642 mm / 104.0 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 5
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2009 ~ 2011

Reviews

Neofiliac score
13%
29%
19%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Improved DSG transmission
  • Rather good design (copied from Audi)
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Somewhat improved styling
  • Very reliable engines
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • Stuck with semi-independent suspensions in the rear
  • No powerful engine options
  • No AWD, no V6
  • CVT as auto gearbox
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Use of CVT for petrol
  • Only FWD

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.