Compare SEAT Ibiza 4 vs Toyota Yaris 3 vs Subaru Impreza 5 Hatchback
Variants
1.0
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.2 60
1.2 70
1.2 TDI
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.4 85
1.4 85 2012+
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 75
1.4 TDI 80
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.6
1.6 DSG
1.6 LPG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.9 TDI 105
1.9 TDI 90
2.0 TDI
1.0
1.33
1.33 Euro6
1.33 Euro6 CVT
1.33 CVT
1.4 D-4D Euro6
1.4 D-4D
1.4
Hybrid Euro6
1.5
1.5 CVT
Hybrid
GRMN
1.6i CVT
2.0i CVT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
385 L / 13.6 cu-ft ~ 1310 L / 46.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.8 L / 8.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.4 L / 4.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.9 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
25.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1510 mm / 59.4 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4460 mm / 175.6 in
Size | Width
1693 mm / 66.7 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Wheelbase
2469 mm / 97.2 in
2510 mm / 98.8 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
650 kg / 1433 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol flat-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
Lineartronic
Production
Availability
2016 ~ 2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
16%
21%
32%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Good front-end styling
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small, unreliable engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- CVT
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Bad CVT
- Hybrid nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.