Compare Subaru Impreza 5 Hatchback vs Ford Focus 4 vs Subaru Impreza 5 Hatchback facelift
Variants
1.6i CVT
2.0i CVT
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 155
1.0 EcoBoost 85
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 95
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 182
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
ST 2.0 EcoBlue
ST 2.3 EcoBoost
ST 2.3 EcoBoost AT
1.6
2.0
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
385 L / 13.6 cu-ft ~ 1310 L / 46.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.8 L / 8.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.4 L / 4.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.9 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
25.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
112 mm / 4.4 in
Size | Height
1480 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4460 mm / 175.6 in
4475 mm / 176.2 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1825 mm / 71.9 in | 1979 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1848 mm / 72.8 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
1553.0 mm / 61.1 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
650 kg / 1433 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol flat-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
Lineartronic
Lineartronic
Production
Availability
2016 ~ 2020
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
61%
37%
Pros
- Good front-end styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Very low fuel consumption
- Strong styling
- Independent rear suspensions
- Overall good styling
- Characterful flat-4 engine
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Bad CVT
- Hybrid nonsense
- Only available with small engines
- Poor performance
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- CVT
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.